FIELD

OPS / AUTOMATION / TOOLS

STATUS

AVAILABLE · REMOTE

AABOUT

About Me

I build the automation and internal tooling that operations teams run on. Most of my work lives in the unglamorous middle: integrations between platforms that were never designed to talk to each other, workflows that replace something a person used to do by hand, and the small tools a team ends up depending on without ever calling them software.

I got here sideways. I studied IT and business analytics, started in operations support, and learned to code because the problems in front of me needed code and nobody else was going to write it. That's still how most of it goes. Something breaks or takes too long, I build the thing that fixes it, and it's usually in use that same week.

The last few years have been spent inside remote-first companies where the messaging layer is the product surface, which means the interesting problems tend to be about context: getting the right information to the right system at the moment someone needs it, without building a second place for that information to go stale.

What I find most interesting right now is how much ground one person can cover with the current generation of AI tooling. Work that would have needed a small engineering team a few years ago is something I can scope, build, and ship between operational responsibilities. That's not a claim about the tools being magic. It's a claim about leverage, and about knowing which problems are worth solving in the first place, which is the part ops experience actually teaches you.

I work nights from the Philippines, on a schedule that overlaps a team spread across several time zones. Remote-first isn't a preference I picked up recently. It's the only way I've ever worked.

Outside of that I keep a heavily planted aquarium, which is the same job as my day job if you think about it: a system with too many variables, where the fix is usually patience rather than intervention.

The case studies are the evidence for all of the above.

01

How I work

AI leverage without engineering discipline is a liability. This is the discipline.

01.01

Read-only until proven otherwise

Production automation gets treated as live infrastructure, because that's what it is. I don't modify, activate, or clone a working scenario without an explicit go-ahead — even when the change looks trivial, and especially when someone's in a hurry. Most automation disasters aren't caused by bad builds. They're caused by good builds edited under time pressure by someone who was fairly sure it would be fine.

01.02

Automation nobody can debug is worse than no automation

A workflow that only I understand is a liability with a delay on it. Anything that runs unattended gets documentation and a troubleshooting path: what it does, what it touches, what it looks like when it fails, and what to check first. This is the least interesting part of the work and the part that determines whether it survives me.

01.03

Solve the operational problem, not the interesting one

Coming from ops means I've been on the receiving end of tools built for the wrong reason. The version that's satisfying to build and the version that removes the actual friction are frequently not the same thing — and the gap between them is where a lot of internal tooling quietly dies.

01.04

Write the context down once

The setup cost of good context is paid once and returned constantly: project conventions, decisions and why they were made, the things a newcomer would get wrong. This used to be for teammates. Now it's for teammates and for the AI tooling I work with, which turns out to want the same thing written the same way.

01.05

Ship it this week

If something can't reach real use within about a week, the scope is usually wrong rather than the timeline. Small things in production teach you more than large things in progress, and an internal tool nobody's touched yet has produced exactly zero information about whether it was worth building.

01.06

Leverage isn't the same as magic

I use agentic tooling for most of what I build, and it genuinely changes what one person can cover. It doesn't decide what's worth building, it doesn't know your operational context, and it will confidently produce something plausible and wrong if you let it. The judgment is still the job. The tooling just removed the excuse that there wasn't time.

02

The spec sheet

LOCATIONPhilippines · remote-first · UTC+8
EXPERIENCE4 years — workflow design, integrations, internal tools
EDUCATIONBS Information Technology, Business Analytics — Dean's List
LANGUAGESEnglish (C1, certified) · Filipino (native)